
As I had an interview with my cousin for Site-Visit, I talked with him again about the Grading Practices in his working place CDI. His mane is Eunseok (Riley) You. He a twenty-four year old Asian-American individual whose target-teaching level is from elementary school to middle school in Chungdahm Learning Institute. Luckily his teaching level is almost the same as I am so I expected it was helpful for me.
CDI http://cdi.chungdahm.com/chungdahm/ is one of the most renowned and well known private academies in Korea whose targeting students’ range is from elementary grade 4th to high school leveled based on placement test.
While CDL follows some fundamental methods when it comes to educating children, they have other various methods to bring out the potential within the students. The age old method of testing is still a very popular approach to properly determining the students’ academic levels. Although students might disagree, the pressure and motivation that derive from exams allow an individual to meet their potential. CDL is no different when it comes to administering exams to the students. For instance, the exams consist of both multiple choice questions and fill-in questions. In terms of format, the tests are pretty straight forward but the grading methods according to CDL are different.
CDL’s approach to grading is not so strict. CDI has two types of tests. One is regular weekly test which was conducted by section teacher. This test consists of reading, listening, speaking and grammar and each section point is 5. This test was aimed to check out how students are following the class. If a student could score as low as a 4 or 5 out of a 20 points and he or she will be rewarded with a passing grade such as a C. After test each student gets feedback from teachers which make students know about their English ability in each section. Another is a kind of level test that was taken place every 3 months. This test also consists of reading, listening, speaking and grammar and each section point is 25. Through this test students are arranged to go to a higher level or take a same course 3 months again. This test also does not have a strict cut off standard. If a student gets average 65 out of 100 points, he or she can go to the next level.
He said almost all students could pass the level test. I thought the tests didn’t have discrimination capacity. So I asked how easy the tests were. He said if students take class hard and do their homework well students can easily do well on a test. In other words this is in no way used to allow the students to discourage or divide excellent or poor but rather it is used to motivate a student and to build confidence in them. Getting low grades do not motivate a student to try harder because what would be the point in trying if getting an F was second nature to them. Instead, encouraging the student for working hard pushes them to work even harder. If he or she was not able to perform well on the first test, there is always room for improvement in the next.
I feel CDL follows traditional methods in educating students but they also implement new ideas as well. I have thought test is to find out who is good or poor or divide students low or high. After talking with him, I realized test can be also used to motivate students to study more or make them have confidence. Therefore, we have to shed our ways from those of the traditional style of the past into the brilliance of the future. The school system in the 20th century matched the style of our parents and our grandparents but with new bright minds that set out to make the world of tomorrow, we have to be out with the old and in with the new.^^